Republic V Morel (CO 72/2014) [2016] SCSC 274 (12 April 2016)

Republic V Morel (CO 72/2014) [2016] SCSC 274 (12 April 2016)

The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's statement was given voluntarily, with no evidence of duress, inducement, or threat, and thus the statement is admissible.

Citation
[2016] SCSC 274
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Andy Morel
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
12 April 2016
Case Number
CO 72/2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Accused's Statement (voire Dire)
Outcome
statement admitted as evidence
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Confession, Voluntariness of Statement, Burden of Proof, Duress
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Andy Morel

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Accused's Statement (voire Dire)

  1. 1 Whether the accused's statement to police was given voluntarily and is admissible as evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's statement was given voluntarily, with no evidence of duress, inducement, or threat, and thus the statement is admissible.

Court Disposition

statement admitted as evidence

Orders

  • The accused's statement is admissible as evidence in the case.