Alexis Monthy v Miranda Esparon (SCA 29 of 2010) [2012] SCCA 8 (9 May 2012)
- Citation
- [2012] SCCA 8
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Correction
- Case number
- SCA 29 of 2010
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Correction
- Case number
- SCA 29 of 2010
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court corrected the parcel title number from H 2257 to H 2557 to give effect to its manifest intention and rectify the accidental error.
Court disposition
judgment corrected
Orders
- Title of the parcel at paragraph 18(i) and (ii) of the judgment dated 13th April 2012 shall read as H 2557 instead of H 2257.
02
Material facts
Parties
Alexis Monthy
Appellant Counsel: Mr. D. SabinoMiranda Esparon
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Quashed Monetary Award: SCR 70,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Correction
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the title number in the judgment should be corrected due to a typographical error
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Registrar General of Lands notified the court of a typographical error in the parcel title number in the judgment.
- Respondent
- Respondent was absent and unrepresented.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
rule 13(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2005 read with rule 5
Court may correct accidental errors in judgments to reflect its manifest intention.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court corrected the parcel title number from H 2257 to H 2557 to give effect to its manifest intention and rectify the accidental error.
Court disposition
judgment corrected
- Title of the parcel at paragraph 18(i) and (ii) of the judgment dated 13th April 2012 shall read as H 2557 instead of H 2257.
Source and reliance status
Court of Appeal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of Appeal
Judgment
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SEYCHELLES Alexis Monthy Appellant VS Miranda Esparon Respondent SCA No: 29/2010 BEFORE: Anthony F. T. Fernando. JA Counsel: Appellant, represented by Mr. D. Sabino Respondent absent and unrepresented Date of Hearing: 10th May 2012 Date of Ruling: 10th May 2012 Anthony F. T. Fernando JA.
RULING 1. The Judgment in this case was delivered by this Court on the 13th of April 2012.
2. One of the orders made in the said judgment was to the effect: “We order the Registrar of Lands to restore ownership of Title H 2257 to both parties namely Alexis Monthy and Miranda Esparon.” 3. We also quashed the decision of the learned trial Judge including the award of SR 70,000 he made in this case, as the monetary value of the Appellant’s share, in the property co- owned by the parties. The parcel was described in our Judgment as H 2257. 4.
5. It has now been brought to our notice by the Registrar General of Lands that the title of the parcel has been incorrectly stated in the Order we made at paragraph 18 of the Judgment. It should be H 2557 and not H 2257. This is undoubtedly a typing error as elsewhere in the body of the Judgment the title of the parcel has always been stated as H 2557. I therefore acting in accordance with rule 13(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2005 read with rule 5 of the said Rules correct the accidental error in the Judgment, so as to give effect to the manifest intention of the Court. Therefore the title of the parcel at paragraph 18 (i) and (ii) of our Judgment dated 13thApril 2012 in the above titled case shall read as H 2557. Anthony F. T. Fernando Justice of Appeal Dated this 10th day of May 2012, Victoria, Seychelles 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.