Karabash v Soudhooa & Ors (CS125/2017) [2020] SCSC 436 (2 February 2020)
The Plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that a sexual assault occurred. Discrepancies in her evidence, lack of corroboration, and credibility issues undermined her claim. The evidence indicated the intercourse was more likely consensual, and thus no fault in law was established.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 436
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Anna Karabash; First Defendant: Ravind Soudhooa; Second Defendant: Zil Pasyon Resorts Limited; Third Defendant: Mr Francis Savy; Fourth Defendant: Mr Kishore Buxani
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2020
- Case Number
- CS125/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Delict, Vicarious Liability, Damages, Consent
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anna Karabash
Plaintiff
Ravind Soudhooa
First Defendant
Zil Pasyon Resorts Limited
Second Defendant
Mr Francis Savy
Third Defendant
Mr Kishore Buxani
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Defendant sexually assaulted the Plaintiff on 4 May 2017
- 2 Whether the act constituted a fault in law
- 3 Whether the First Defendant was acting in the course of employment
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that a sexual assault occurred. Discrepancies in her evidence, lack of corroboration, and credibility issues undermined her claim. The evidence indicated the intercourse was more likely consensual, and thus no fault in law was established.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed with costs
Orders
- The suit is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment