Lesperance and Others v Lesperance and Another (63 of 2000) [2005] SCSC 28 (16 February 2005)

Lesperance and Others v Lesperance and Another (63 of 2000) [2005] SCSC 28 (16 February 2005)

The 1st defendant fraudulently sold a portion of succession property without the consent and approval of the heirs, breaching her duties as executrix; thus, the transfer deed is revoked.

Citation
[2005] SCSC 28
Parties
Plaintiff: Arthon Lesperance; Plaintiff: Heribert Lesperance; Plaintiff: Josianne Dubignon; Defendant: Mariona Lesperance; Defendant: Ombre Vert (Pty) Ltd (Represented by Elisie Simeon)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
16 February 2005
Case Number
63 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
transfer deed revoked; consideration to be refunded; parties to bear own costs
Legal Topics
Revocation of Deed, Executor's Authority, Fraudulent Transfer
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arthon Lesperance

Plaintiff

Heribert Lesperance

Plaintiff

Josianne Dubignon

Plaintiff

Mariona Lesperance

Defendant

Ombre Vert (Pty) Ltd (Represented by Elisie Simeon)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st defendant, as executrix, had authority to transfer succession property without heirs' consent
  2. 2 Whether the transfer to the 2nd defendant was fraudulent and in breach of executrix duties

Ratio Decidendi

The 1st defendant fraudulently sold a portion of succession property without the consent and approval of the heirs, breaching her duties as executrix; thus, the transfer deed is revoked.

Court Disposition

transfer deed revoked; consideration to be refunded; parties to bear own costs

Orders

  • The transfer of land by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant by deed dated 16th March 1994 is rescinded.
  • The Registrar General is directed to record the revocation in the Register of deeds.