Seychelles Judgment

Supreme Court

R vs Lozaique (Criminal side No. 86 of 2005) [2013] SCSC 4 (9 January 2013)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the accused's guilty plea, first offender status, severe health deterioration, and mitigating circumstances, a non-custodial sentence is appropriate despite the seriousness of the offence.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentence suspended

Orders

  • Accused sentenced to two years imprisonment, suspended for two years
  • Right of appeal explained

02

Material facts

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor Counsel: Mr. Chinasamy

Jossy Lozaique

Accused Counsel: Mr. Bonte

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment Period: 2
  • Suspension Period: 2

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Appropriate sentence for attempted murder given mitigating circumstances

Party arguments

Applicant
The accused pleaded guilty, is a first offender, has a family, and suffers from severe health issues including chronic alcoholism, head trauma, and other medical conditions. He sought forgiveness and has been in and out of hospital, which affected his court attendance.
Respondent
The prosecution presented the charge of attempted murder, noting the accused intentionally used a knife to cause serious injuries to the victim.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's reasoning and application of sentencing discretion under Penal Code section 207(a)

    A custodial sentence is ordinarily imposed for attempted murder, but mitigating factors such as health and first offender status may justify a non-custodial sentence.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the accused's guilty plea, first offender status, severe health deterioration, and mitigating circumstances, a non-custodial sentence is appropriate despite the seriousness of the offence.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentence suspended

  • Accused sentenced to two years imprisonment, suspended for two years
  • Right of appeal explained

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court

Judgment

[2013] SCSC 4

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES

THE REPUBLIC VS.

JOSSY LOZAIQUE Criminal side No. 86 of 2005 Mr. Chinasamy for the Republic Mr. Bonte for the Accused Gaswaga J

SENTENCE [1] The accused was charged with the following offence:- Count 1 Statement of offence Attempted Murder contrary to and punishable under section 207(a) of the Penal Code. Particulars of offence The particulars alleged that Jossy Julien Lozaique on the 15th August, 2005 attempted to unlawfully cause the death of Neil Esparon at Cascade. [2] The accused has now pleaded guilty and saved the precious time of the court. He has asked for forgiveness. The accused is also a first offender with a family to look after and for the past few years he has been in and out of hospital. His health has actually severely deteriorated and according to the medical report dated 05/07/2012 prepared by Doctor Anusha Ganeshan and submitted by the Ministry of Health, Jossy Lozaique was taken to hospital on the 14th of April 2012 by relatives after he had fallen off his bed, that he exhibited confusion and abnormal behavior associated with fever. [3] The history indicates that in November, 2010 he was admitted to surgical ward when he suffered a head trauma with hemorrhagic contusion on CT findings. He is also a known Chronic Alcoholic. The general examination revealed that he was conscious, alert and confused, disoriented and a bit aggressive and restless. He also had multiple old bruises and scars. He was admitted to medical ward for further management and observation. [4] Another time the

patient was diagnosed with meningitis and found to be a Chronic Alcoholic with hypoglycemia, alcoholic withdrawal and Old cerebrovascular accident. He was re-admitted on 3rd November, 2011 and on 6th November, 2011 he was reviewed when he visited a neurologist and advised to continue antiepileptic treatment. The diagnosis also shows that he occasionally experiences alcoholic fits. [5] The accused missed attending Court on several occasions when he was reported sick and admitted in hospital. The few times he appeared before this Court he looked so sick, weak and frail and could hardly stand for long. He has now tendered his plea of guilty in respect of a serious offence, attempted murder, which would ordinarily attract a custodial sentence especially bearing in mind that he had intentionally used a knife to cause serious injuries to the victim. [6] It is my considered view that in these circumstances a non-custodial sentence should be imposed. The accused is accordingly sentenced to a period of two years in prison which period will be suspended for two years. [7] Right of Appeal explained. D. GASWAGA

JUDGE Dated this 9th Day of January, 2013

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 207(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.