Seychelles Judgment

Supreme Court

R vs Elizabeth (CO 53.2013) [2013] SCSC 142 (16 December 2013)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The accused is denied bail due to substantial grounds for believing he would fail to surrender, commit further offences, or obstruct justice if released.

Court disposition

bail application rejected

Orders

  • Accused to continue to be remanded in custody pending trial

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution Counsel: Mr. Thachette

Daren Chris Elizabeth

Accused Counsel: Mr Gabriel

Amounts and remedies

  • Quantity of Currency Seized: 0

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Bail Application Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the accused should be granted bail pending trial

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for the accused sought bail, arguing for release pending trial.
Respondent
State Counsel opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offences, risk of absconding, committing further offences, and obstructing justice.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Misuse of Drugs Act

    Substantial grounds for believing accused would fail to surrender, commit further offences, or obstruct justice justify denial of bail.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The accused is denied bail due to substantial grounds for believing he would fail to surrender, commit further offences, or obstruct justice if released.

Court disposition

bail application rejected

  • Accused to continue to be remanded in custody pending trial

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court

Judgment

[2013] SCSC 142

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES Criminal Side: CO 53/2013 [2013] SCSC 142

THE REPUBLIC versus

DAREN CHRIS ELIZABETH Accused Heard: Counsel: 6 December 2013 Mr. Thachette, State Counsel for the Republic Mr Gabriel for the accused Delivered: 16 December 2013

RULING McKee J [1] The accused is charged with [1] Trafficking in a Controlled Drug and [2] Cultivation of cannabis plant, offences contrary to the provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act. [2] I have considered the submissions from Counsel. In my view Judge de Silva covered the salient points in his earlier ruling on bail. I take into account the circumstances as set out in the originating Affidavit. A considerable quantity of plants, seeds and herbal material was recovered. A substantial amount of currency in various denominations was also seized. The accused was found at the scene. [3] A reasonable explanation has been provided by Counsel for the Republic for the loss of a quantity of plant material. I take into account the serious nature of these offences and the probable method of dealing with the matter if a conviction was to follow. [4] I find that there are substantial grounds for believing that if the accused was released on bail he would fail to surrender to custody and appear for trial, commit further offences or otherwise obstruct the course of justice. [5] The application for bail is rejected. [6] I order that the accused will continue to be remanded in custody pending trial. Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 16 December 2013 C McKee Judge of the Supreme Court 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Misuse of Drugs Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.