R vs Barra (CR 12.2014) [2014] SCSC 214 (23 June 2014)

R vs Barra (CR 12.2014) [2014] SCSC 214 (23 June 2014)

The seriousness of the offence, the accused's prior role as an NDEA officer, and the risk of interference with witnesses justify denial of bail.

Citation
[2014] SCSC 214
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Joel Barra
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
23 June 2014
Case Number
CR 12.2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application
Outcome
bail application declined
Legal Topics
Bail, Drug Trafficking
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Joel Barra

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether the accused should be granted bail for trafficking in a controlled drug

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of the offence, the accused's prior role as an NDEA officer, and the risk of interference with witnesses justify denial of bail.

Court Disposition

bail application declined

Orders

  • Application for bail is declined.