Barra v Madeleine & Ano. (CS 79/2014) [2017] SCSC 53 (29 January 2017)

Barra v Madeleine & Ano. (CS 79/2014) [2017] SCSC 53 (29 January 2017)

The 1st Defendant was at fault for failing to keep a proper lookout and abruptly turning across the Plaintiff's lane, causing the collision. The 2nd Defendant is vicariously liable as the 1st Defendant was acting within the scope of his employment. The Plaintiff's claims for loss of earnings were unproven, but claims for the written-off motorcycle, alternative transport, and moral damages were allowed.

Citation
[2017] SCSC 53
Parties
Plaintiff: Barry Barra; 1st Defendant: Kenneth Madeleine; 2nd Defendant: National Drug Enforcement Agency
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
29 January 2017
Case Number
CS 79/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident, Negligence, Damages, Employer's Liability
Source Language
English
Tort Law Delictual Liability Vicarious Liability Motor Vehicle Accident Negligence Damages Employer's Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barry Barra

Plaintiff

Kenneth Madeleine

1st Defendant

National Drug Enforcement Agency

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Defendant was at fault in causing the collision with the Plaintiff's motorcycle
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd Defendant is vicariously liable for the acts of the 1st Defendant
  3. 3 Assessment of damages due to the Plaintiff

Ratio Decidendi

The 1st Defendant was at fault for failing to keep a proper lookout and abruptly turning across the Plaintiff's lane, causing the collision. The 2nd Defendant is vicariously liable as the 1st Defendant was acting within the scope of his employment. The Plaintiff's claims for loss of earnings were unproven, but claims for the written-off motorcycle, alternative transport, and moral damages were allowed.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Plaintiff

Orders

  • Defendants to pay Plaintiff SR90,650.00 as damages, jointly and severally, with interest and costs.