Benoit v Interior and Construction design PTY (LTD) (MA 113/2015) [2016] SCSC 518 (8 June 2016)

Benoit v Interior and Construction design PTY (LTD) (MA 113/2015) [2016] SCSC 518 (8 June 2016)

The applicant's reasons for delay were insufficient and unacceptable; the applicant was negligent and did not take the judgment seriously, thus leave to appeal out of time is declined.

Citation
[2016] SCSC 518
Parties
Applicant/plaintiff: Michel Benoit; Respondent/defendant: Interior and Construction Design Proprietary Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
8 June 2016
Case Number
MA 113/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Delay in Filing Appeal, Judgment Enforcement
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Delay in Filing Appeal Judgment Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michel Benoit

Applicant/plaintiff

Interior and Construction Design Proprietary Ltd

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's reasons for delay were insufficient and unacceptable; the applicant was negligent and did not take the judgment seriously, thus leave to appeal out of time is declined.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed