R v Toussaint (Criminal Appeal Side No. 12 of 2010) [2011] SCSC 79 (25 April 2011)
The court held that the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant drove dangerously, causing the fatal accident, and that none of the grounds of appeal had merit. The conviction and sentence were affirmed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] SCSC 79
- Parties
- Appellant: Bernard Robert Toussaint; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2011
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal Side No. 12 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving, Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Criminal Appeals, Sentencing
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Robert Toussaint
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for causing death by dangerous driving and dangerous driving was supported by the evidence
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate erred in accepting the prosecution's evidence regarding the point of impact and the position of the deceased
- 3 Whether contributory negligence or alleged drinking by occupants of the mini-moke affected the appellant's criminal liability
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant drove dangerously, causing the fatal accident, and that none of the grounds of appeal had merit. The conviction and sentence were affirmed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Orders
- Appellant given 3 months to pay fines imposed by the trial court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment