Boniface v Malvina (MA 314/2017 arising in CS 33/2016) [2018] SCSC 8101 (1 March 2018)
The stay of execution is granted because the balance of prejudice and special circumstances favor the applicant, and refusal would render the appeal nugatory and cause irreparable prejudice.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8101
- Parties
- Applicant: Cecile Boniface; Respondent: Gonzalves Malvina
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2018
- Case Number
- MA 314/2017 arising in CS 33/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application (stay of Execution) / Ruling on Motion for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal, Matrimonial Property, Irreparable Harm
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
Cecile Boniface
Applicant
Gonzalves Malvina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application (stay of Execution) / Ruling on Motion for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution of the judgment should be granted pending appeal
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm if the stay is not granted
- 3 Whether the balance of prejudice favors granting the stay
Ratio Decidendi
The stay of execution is granted because the balance of prejudice and special circumstances favor the applicant, and refusal would render the appeal nugatory and cause irreparable prejudice.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution allowed
Orders
- Judgment of 9th November 2017 is stayed pending final determination of the appeal in SCA 41 of 2017
- Status quo of the dwelling house remains unchanged until appeal is determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment