Civil Construction Company Limited v Leon (MA3/2017) [2017] SCSC 42 (26 January 2017)
It is more reasonable and just for the parties to await the final outcome of the appeal before any money is disbursed, and a stay of execution is appropriate provided the defendant gives a written undertaking of sufficient assets as security.
- Citation
- [2017] SCSC 42
- Parties
- Petitioner: Civil Construction Company Limited; Respondent: Frederick Leon
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2017
- Case Number
- MA3/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal, Security for Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Civil Construction Company Limited
Petitioner
Frederick Leon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution of judgment pending appeal
- 2 Appropriate conditions for granting stay
Ratio Decidendi
It is more reasonable and just for the parties to await the final outcome of the appeal before any money is disbursed, and a stay of execution is appropriate provided the defendant gives a written undertaking of sufficient assets as security.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted with conditions
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment in CS 35/12 delivered on 30th November, 2016 is granted.
- Defendant to provide a written undertaking of sufficient assets as security, to be deposited with the Registrar before the appeal is heard.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment