Benoiton & Ano v Ah-Kong (CS 27/2014) [2016] SCSC 7 (18 January 2016)

Benoiton & Ano v Ah-Kong (CS 27/2014) [2016] SCSC 7 (18 January 2016)

The defendant's actions constituted unlawful encroachment and a civil wrong (faute) under Article 1382, substantiated by documentary and witness evidence. The defendant failed to properly deny material facts, and is liable for damages and subject to prohibitory and mandatory injunctions.

Citation
[2016] SCSC 7
Parties
Plaintiff: Conrad Benoiton; Plaintiff: Marie-Rose Benoiton; Defendant: Regis Ah-Kong
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
18 January 2016
Case Number
CS 27/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs
Legal Topics
Land Encroachment, Damages, Injunctions, Faute (civil Wrong)
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Conrad Benoiton

Plaintiff

Marie-Rose Benoiton

Plaintiff

Regis Ah-Kong

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant unlawfully encroached on the plaintiffs' land
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is liable for damages and required to remove unauthorized constructions
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to injunctions and compensation for loss and distress

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's actions constituted unlawful encroachment and a civil wrong (faute) under Article 1382, substantiated by documentary and witness evidence. The defendant failed to properly deny material facts, and is liable for damages and subject to prohibitory and mandatory injunctions.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • Defendant to pay SR1,694,105 in damages to the plaintiffs
  • Defendant restrained by prohibitory injunction from trespassing and encroaching on Parcel B1624