In the matter of Marguerite Bresson (MA 183 of 2022) [2022] SCSC 1034 (24 November 2022)
The petitioner, having reached advanced age and expressed unwillingness to continue, and having provided a satisfactory inventory, meets the statutory grounds for revocation of her appointment as executrix under the Curatelle Act.
- Citation
- [2022] SCSC 1034
- Parties
- Petitioner: Marguerite Bresson born Clarisse; Respondent: Curator appointed under Section 3 of the Curatelle Act, 2021
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2022
- Case Number
- MA 183 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Executrix Appointment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Executrix, Curatelle Act, Inventory of Estate, Distribution to Heirs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marguerite Bresson born Clarisse
Petitioner
Curator appointed under Section 3 of the Curatelle Act, 2021
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Executrix Appointment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner should be relieved of her duties as executrix due to age and unwillingness
- 2 Whether the requirements for revocation under the Curatelle Act and Civil Code are met
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner, having reached advanced age and expressed unwillingness to continue, and having provided a satisfactory inventory, meets the statutory grounds for revocation of her appointment as executrix under the Curatelle Act.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Appointment of Marguerite Bresson born Clarisse as executrix to the estate of Michel Adam is revoked
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment