Ex-parte: Belle (Represented by Mr Gilbert Eliza) (CS 28/2017) [2018] SCSC 8080 (19 February 2018)
The objections raised by the respondent are dismissed as the petition and memorandum comply with the relevant statutory provisions, no prejudice was suffered by the respondent, and the evidence as to valuation and inability to subdivide stands unchallenged.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8080
- Parties
- Petitioner: Terrence Belle; Respondent: Daniel Belle
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2018
- Case Number
- CS 28/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Objection to Petition for Sale by Licitation
- Outcome
- Objection dismissed; petition for sale by licitation allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Sale by Licitation, Objection to Licitation, Co Ownership, Division of Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terrence Belle
Petitioner
Daniel Belle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Objection to Petition for Sale by Licitation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition for sale by licitation complies with the Immoveable Property (Judicial Sales) Act
- 2 Whether the Memorandum of Charges is valid
- 3 Whether the property can be conveniently subdivided instead of sale by licitation
Ratio Decidendi
The objections raised by the respondent are dismissed as the petition and memorandum comply with the relevant statutory provisions, no prejudice was suffered by the respondent, and the evidence as to valuation and inability to subdivide stands unchallenged.
Court Disposition
Objection dismissed; petition for sale by licitation allowed
Orders
- Petition for sale by licitation to proceed as per statutory formalities under Sections 104 and 105 of the Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment