Dodin v Barbier & Ors (CS 222/2005) [2007] SCSC 36 (28 September 2007)
The plaintiff was entitled to damages for the gunshot injury and for 4 days of illegal detention post-hospitalization, but not for the period spent in hospital under police guard, as that was for medical treatment. The quantum of damages was determined based on comparable precedents and the facts of the case.
- Citation
- [2007] SCSC 36
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Davis Dodin; Defendant: Mickey Barbier; Defendant: Pierre Adelaide; Defendant: Government of Seychelles
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Case Number
- CS 222/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Unlawful Detention, Damages, Vicarious Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Davis Dodin
Plaintiff
Mickey Barbier
Defendant
Pierre Adelaide
Defendant
Government of Seychelles
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for personal injuries caused by police shooting
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's detention was unlawful and compensable
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was entitled to damages for the gunshot injury and for 4 days of illegal detention post-hospitalization, but not for the period spent in hospital under police guard, as that was for medical treatment. The quantum of damages was determined based on comparable precedents and the facts of the case.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded total sum of Rs.50,000 for pain, suffering, and illegal detention
- Interest and costs awarded to the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment