Davison v Davison (MC 19/2020) [2021] SCSC 1010 (8 October 2021)
A serious procedural irregularity occurred as the petitioner and co-executors were not heard before the respondent was appointed executrix ex-parte, tainting the validity of the proceedings and rendering the order a nullity. The order appointing the respondent as executrix is set aside; she is no longer executrix from the date of judgment.
- Citation
- [2021] SCSC 1010
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mark Edward Davison; Respondent: Ganokwan Phansuwan Davison
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 8 October 2021
- Case Number
- MC 19/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Petition to Set Aside Appointment of Executrix / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition partly granted
- Legal Topics
- Nullity of Appointment of Executrix, Procedural Irregularity, Functus Officio, Effect of Nullity on Acts Performed
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Edward Davison
Petitioner
Ganokwan Phansuwan Davison
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition to Set Aside Appointment of Executrix / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court can set aside its own order appointing an executrix due to procedural irregularity
- 2 Effect of nullity of appointment on acts performed by the executrix
Ratio Decidendi
A serious procedural irregularity occurred as the petitioner and co-executors were not heard before the respondent was appointed executrix ex-parte, tainting the validity of the proceedings and rendering the order a nullity. The order appointing the respondent as executrix is set aside; she is no longer executrix from the date of judgment.
Court Disposition
Petition partly granted
Orders
- Order of 16th November 2006 appointing respondent as executrix set aside; respondent no longer executrix from date of judgment; testamentary executors remain sole executors.
- Registrar General to amend records accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment