Denise v Heirs Sullivan & Ors (CS 214/1996) [2003] SCSC 5 (28 February 2003)

Denise v Heirs Sullivan & Ors (CS 214/1996) [2003] SCSC 5 (28 February 2003)

The Plaintiff's parcel is enclaved and the only practical, shortest, and least damaging motorable access to the public road is via the route labelled 'Drive' crossing the Defendants' properties. The Defendants failed to prove otherwise. The Plaintiff is entitled to a right of way as claimed.

Citation
[2003] SCSC 5
Parties
Plaintiff: Denise; First and Second Defendants: Heirs Suzanne & Ludovic M Sullivan; Third Defendant: Third Defendant; Fourth Defendant: Fourth Defendant; Fifth Defendant: Fifth Defendant
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
28 February 2003
Case Number
CS 214/1996
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim granted
Legal Topics
Right of Way, Enclaved Land, Servitude, Access to Public Road
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Denise

Plaintiff

Heirs Suzanne & Ludovic M Sullivan

First and Second Defendants

Third Defendant

Third Defendant

Fourth Defendant

Fourth Defendant

Fifth Defendant

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a right of way over the Defendants' properties to access the public road under Articles 682 & 683 of the Civil Code of Seychelles

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff's parcel is enclaved and the only practical, shortest, and least damaging motorable access to the public road is via the route labelled 'Drive' crossing the Defendants' properties. The Defendants failed to prove otherwise. The Plaintiff is entitled to a right of way as claimed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim granted

Orders

  • Plaintiff declared to have a motorable right of way over Defendants' properties as per the 'Drive' in Exhibit K
  • No hindrance or obstruction to Plaintiff's access