Dhanjee v Michel & Ors (CP 3 of 2014) [2014] SCCC 10 (29 July 2014)

Dhanjee v Michel & Ors (CP 3 of 2014) [2014] SCCC 10 (29 July 2014)

The applications are not maintainable in law before the court due to procedural irregularity which cannot be condoned.

Citation
[2014] SCCC 10
Parties
Petitioner: Viral Dhanjee; 1st Respondent: James Alix Michel; 2nd Respondent: The Speaker of the National Assembly; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney General Representing the Government; 4th Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Constitutional Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
29 July 2014
Case Number
CP 3 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Proceedings and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Applications dismissed as not maintainable
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Leave to Appeal, Procedural Irregularity
Source Language
English
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Leave to Appeal Procedural Irregularity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Viral Dhanjee

Petitioner

James Alix Michel

1st Respondent

The Speaker of the National Assembly

2nd Respondent

The Attorney General Representing the Government

3rd Respondent

The Attorney General

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Proceedings and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applications for stay of proceedings and leave to appeal are maintainable in law due to alleged procedural irregularity

Ratio Decidendi

The applications are not maintainable in law before the court due to procedural irregularity which cannot be condoned.

Court Disposition

Applications dismissed as not maintainable

Orders

  • Applications MA208 of 2014 and MA209 of 2014 are set aside