Godly v Ahwan (SCA 26 of 1994) [1995] SCCA 8 (19 October 1995)

Godly v Ahwan (SCA 26 of 1994) [1995] SCCA 8 (19 October 1995)

Application for intervention is not receivable as the Supreme Court is functus officio and appellate procedure does not allow such intervention.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] SCCA 8
Parties
Appellant: Didier Georges Goiley; 1st Respondent: Levy Ah Wan; 2nd Respondent: Gracia Bastienne; 3rd Respondent: Anne Magnan
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Case Number
SCA 26 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Intervention Application
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Intervention, Inheritance, Appellate Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Intervention Inheritance Appellate Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Didier Georges Goiley

Appellant

Levy Ah Wan

1st Respondent

Gracia Bastienne

2nd Respondent

Anne Magnan

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Intervention Application

  1. 1 Whether a non-party can intervene in appellate proceedings after Supreme Court is functus officio

Ratio Decidendi

Application for intervention is not receivable as the Supreme Court is functus officio and appellate procedure does not allow such intervention.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • application for intervention is refused