R vs Ignace (Criminal Side No. 78 of 2010) [2013] SCSC 9 (29 January 2013)
The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in possession of 33.3 grams of Cannabis, which by law gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of trafficking. The accused failed to rebut this presumption. The chain of custody and identity of the drug were established, and the accused's statement under caution was corroborated by independent evidence.
- Citation
- [2013] SCSC 9
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Collin Ignace
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2013
- Case Number
- Criminal Side No. 78 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Possession of Controlled Substances, Evidence, Presumption of Trafficking
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Collin Ignace
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was in possession of a controlled drug
- 2 Whether the accused was trafficking in a controlled drug by virtue of possession
- 3 Whether the chain of custody and identity of the drug was established
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in possession of 33.3 grams of Cannabis, which by law gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of trafficking. The accused failed to rebut this presumption. The chain of custody and identity of the drug were established, and the accused's statement under caution was corroborated by independent evidence.
Court Disposition
conviction
Orders
- The accused is found guilty of trafficking in a controlled drug and is convicted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment