Electoral Commission v Attorney General (CP 4 of 2015) [2015] SCCC 5 (5 October 2015)

Electoral Commission v Attorney General (CP 4 of 2015) [2015] SCCC 5 (5 October 2015)

The petition was dismissed because it sought an opinion or interpretation rather than redress for an actual or likely contravention of the Charter as required by article 46(1) of the Constitution. The court held that permitting such applications would open the floodgates and is not within the court's jurisdiction unless a specific contravention is alleged.

Citation
[2015] SCCC 5
Parties
Petitioner: Electoral Commission; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Constitutional Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
5 October 2015
Case Number
CP 4 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Statutes, Constitutionality of Legislation, Access to Constitutional Court
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Electoral Commission

Petitioner

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether section 8(1A) of the Elections (Amendment) Act contravenes article 24 of the Constitution
  2. 2 Whether the Constitutional Court can issue a ruling on the interpretation of a statute absent a specific claim of contravention

Ratio Decidendi

The petition was dismissed because it sought an opinion or interpretation rather than redress for an actual or likely contravention of the Charter as required by article 46(1) of the Constitution. The court held that permitting such applications would open the floodgates and is not within the court's jurisdiction unless a specific contravention is alleged.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed