Athanase v R (CN 5/2014) [2016] SCSC 460 (21 June 2016)

The conviction was quashed because the plea was equivocal, having been based on the advocate's admission of facts rather than the accused's own admission, contrary to law.

Citation: [2016] SCSC 460
Parties: Appellant: Elvis Athanase; Respondent: The Republic
Court: Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Seychelles
Judgment Date: 21 June 2016
Case Number: CN 5/2014
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome: appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered
Legal Topics: Plea of Guilty, Admission of Facts, Totality of Sentences, Conviction, Sentencing
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Plea of Guilty Admission of Facts Totality of Sentences Conviction Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Elvis Athanase

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the conviction based on the admission of facts by the advocate instead of the accused was lawful
2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly harsh and excessive
3 Whether the principle of totality of sentences was considered

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was quashed because the plea was equivocal, having been based on the advocate's admission of facts rather than the accused's own admission, contrary to law.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no retrial ordered

Orders

Conviction quashed
No retrial ordered