Esparon v Esparon (DC 59/2008) [2012] SCSC 5 (2 February 2012)
Despite the property being registered in the respondent's sole name, both parties made contributions, with the applicant making a greater cash contribution. Equity requires the property be considered jointly owned and divided 60% to the applicant and 40% to the respondent, with a clean break preferred by both parties.
- Citation
- [2012] SCSC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Esparon; Respondent: Esparon
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2012
- Case Number
- DC 59/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Property Division / Judgment
- Outcome
- Matrimonial property declared jointly owned; shares apportioned 60% to applicant and 40% to respondent; clean break ordered with options for parties to buy out each other's shares or sale on open market.
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Division of Assets, Contribution to Matrimonial Assets, Clean Break Principle
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esparon
Applicant
Esparon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Property Division / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the matrimonial property registered in the respondent's sole name should be settled in the applicant's sole name or divided between the parties
- 2 What proportion of the matrimonial assets each party is entitled to based on their contributions
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the property being registered in the respondent's sole name, both parties made contributions, with the applicant making a greater cash contribution. Equity requires the property be considered jointly owned and divided 60% to the applicant and 40% to the respondent, with a clean break preferred by both parties.
Court Disposition
Matrimonial property declared jointly owned; shares apportioned 60% to applicant and 40% to respondent; clean break ordered with options for parties to buy out each other's shares or sale on open market.
Orders
- Respondent has first option to purchase applicant's 60% share within 6 months; if not exercised, applicant may purchase respondent's 40% share within the next 6 months; if neither exercises option, property to be sold and proceeds divided 60/40.
- Upon purchase of shares, sole ownership and registration to vest in purchasing party; judgment and proof of payment sufficient for Land Registrar to effect transfer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment