Laporte v Seraphine (309 of 2005) [2006] SCSC 10 (11 May 2006)

Laporte v Seraphine (309 of 2005) [2006] SCSC 10 (11 May 2006)

The uncontradicted evidence established that the defendant made unsubstantiated accusations, trespassed, and harassed the plaintiff, making him liable in damages and subject to injunctive relief.

Citation
[2006] SCSC 10
Parties
Plaintiff: Fernand Laporte; Defendant: Gerard Seraphine
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
11 May 2006
Case Number
309 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Delictual Action / Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
judgment for plaintiff
Legal Topics
Harassment, Trespass, Defamation, Damages
Source Language
English
Tort Harassment Trespass Defamation Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fernand Laporte

Plaintiff

Gerard Seraphine

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Delictual Action / Ex Parte Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant insulted, threatened, and trespassed on the plaintiff's property
  2. 2 Whether the defendant made false and malicious accusations against the plaintiff
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages and injunctive relief

Ratio Decidendi

The uncontradicted evidence established that the defendant made unsubstantiated accusations, trespassed, and harassed the plaintiff, making him liable in damages and subject to injunctive relief.

Court Disposition

judgment for plaintiff

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff Rs20,000 as damages
  • Defendant restrained from insulting, threatening, and approaching the plaintiff