Labiche and Others v Laporte (22 2000) [2005] SCSC 32 (4 May 2005)
The defendant failed to rebut the presumption of fault under Article 1383(2) as his defence was a complete denial and did not plead or prove that the damage was solely due to the negligence of the deceased. The evidence established that the defendant was involved in the accident causing the death, and is therefore liable in damages.
- Citation
- [2005] SCSC 32
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Francoise Labiche; Plaintiff: Wilven Elizabeth; Defendant: Mr Brian Laporte
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2005
- Case Number
- 22 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Delict, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Presumption of Fault, Damages, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francoise Labiche
Plaintiff
Wilven Elizabeth
Plaintiff
Mr Brian Laporte
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the death of Louis Guy Elizabeth under Article 1383(2) of the Civil Code
- 2 Whether the presumption of fault under Article 1383(2) is rebutted
- 3 Assessment of damages for material and moral loss
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to rebut the presumption of fault under Article 1383(2) as his defence was a complete denial and did not plead or prove that the damage was solely due to the negligence of the deceased. The evidence established that the defendant was involved in the accident causing the death, and is therefore liable in damages.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay 1st plaintiff Rs. 40,000 (Rs. 30,000 for loss of financial support, Rs. 10,000 for moral damages)
- Defendant to pay 3rd plaintiff Rs. 5,000 for moral damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment