Gangadoo v Cable and Wireless (Civil Side No: 274 of 2009) [2011] SCSC 81 (25 July 2011)

Gangadoo v Cable and Wireless (Civil Side No: 274 of 2009) [2011] SCSC 81 (25 July 2011)

The plaintiff failed to prove economic impoverishment or detriment, and the defendant's enrichment was lawful as the junction box was erected with the Government's permission. The plaintiff had other legal remedies available. Therefore, the claim for unjust enrichment fails.

Citation
[2011] SCSC 81
Parties
Plaintiff: Gangadoo; Defendant: Cable and Wireless
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
25 July 2011
Case Number
Civil Side No: 274 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Unjust Enrichment, Property Law, Restitution
Source Language
English
Civil Law Unjust Enrichment Property Law Restitution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gangadoo

Plaintiff

Cable and Wireless

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff by maintaining a junction box on the plaintiff's land without lawful cause
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff suffered economic detriment as a result of the defendant's actions
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff had another legal remedy available

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove economic impoverishment or detriment, and the defendant's enrichment was lawful as the junction box was erected with the Government's permission. The plaintiff had other legal remedies available. Therefore, the claim for unjust enrichment fails.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Suit dismissed with costs to the defendant