Walter v Baker (SCA 20 of 2015) [2017] SCCA 36 (6 December 2017)
The default judgment was improperly entered because the case was called at a time different from that ordered by the court, without the appellant's knowledge, and a pending request for further and better particulars had not been addressed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] SCCA 36
- Parties
- Appellant: Giselle Walter; Respondent: Wellinson Baker (also known as Wilson Baker)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2017
- Case Number
- SCA 20 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court Default Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Failure to File Defence, Adjournment of Proceedings
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Giselle Walter
Appellant
Wellinson Baker (also known as Wilson Baker)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment was properly entered against the appellant due to failure to appear and file a statement of defence at the time ordered by the court
- 2 Whether the change in the time of the court fixture without the appellant's knowledge invalidated the default judgment
- 3 Whether a pending request for further and better particulars affected the obligation to file a statement of defence
Ratio Decidendi
The default judgment was improperly entered because the case was called at a time different from that ordered by the court, without the appellant's knowledge, and a pending request for further and better particulars had not been addressed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- judgment of the court below set aside
- matter remitted to the Supreme Court for continuation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment