H. Savy Insurance v Poris (MA 254/2017 (arising in CS 22/2017)) [2018] SCSC 8212 (10 July 2018)
The applicant was aware of the date fixed for mention and failed to attend for their own reasons; there is no legal duty on the court to notify the absent party of the ex parte hearing date. The application to set aside the ex parte judgment has no merit.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8212
- Parties
- Plaintiff: H. Savy Insurance; Defendant: Goldyporis
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2018
- Case Number
- MA 254/2017 (arising in CS 22/2017)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Service of Summons, Damages for Breach of Insurance Contract
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H. Savy Insurance
Plaintiff
Goldyporis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex parte judgment should be set aside under section 69 of the Seychelles Code of Civil Procedure
- 2 Whether the court has a duty to notify the absent party of the ex parte hearing date
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was aware of the date fixed for mention and failed to attend for their own reasons; there is no legal duty on the court to notify the absent party of the ex parte hearing date. The application to set aside the ex parte judgment has no merit.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application to set aside ex parte judgment is dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment