Alice v Alice & Ors (MC 04 of 2025) [2025] SCSC 57 (3 April 2025)

Alice v Alice & Ors (MC 04 of 2025) [2025] SCSC 57 (3 April 2025)

Based on uncontroverted evidence and medical testimony confirming the 1st Respondent's incapacity, the court found interdiction appropriate and appointed the Applicant as guardian in the Respondent's best interests.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] SCSC 57
Parties
Applicant: Hilda Paulette Alice; 1st Respondent: Patrick Alice; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Case Number
MC 04 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Petition for Interdiction and Appointment of Guardian / Final Order/ruling
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Interdiction, Guardianship, Mental Incapacity
Source Language
en
Family Law Mental Health Law Interdiction Guardianship Mental Incapacity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hilda Paulette Alice

Applicant

Patrick Alice

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition for Interdiction and Appointment of Guardian / Final Order/ruling

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent should be interdicted due to mental and physical incapacity
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant should be appointed as guardian of the 1st Respondent

Ratio Decidendi

Based on uncontroverted evidence and medical testimony confirming the 1st Respondent's incapacity, the court found interdiction appropriate and appointed the Applicant as guardian in the Respondent's best interests.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • 1st Respondent Patrick Alice is interdicted.
  • Applicant Hilda Paulette Alice is appointed as guardian of Patrick Alice.