Labiche v Kolsh (CA 14(A)/2011) [2018] SCSC 8072 (13 February 2018)
The Tribunal erred in allocating the burden of proof solely to the appellant, contrary to statutory requirements that place the burden on the employer to prove payment where records are lacking. The appellant's evidence was sufficient in the absence of rebuttal or records from the respondent. The appeal is allowed and the appellant is awarded salaries for overtime, transport allowance, and costs.
- Citation
- [2018] SCSC 8072
- Parties
- Appellant: Jane Labiche; Respondent: Marie-Mai Kolsh
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2018
- Case Number
- CA 14(A)/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Terminal Benefits, Annual Leave, Transport Allowance, Overtime Pay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Labiche
Appellant
Marie-Mai Kolsh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in dismissing the appellant's claims for accrued leave, overtime, and transport allowance
- 2 Whether the burden of proof was correctly allocated between employer and employee
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in allocating the burden of proof solely to the appellant, contrary to statutory requirements that place the burden on the employer to prove payment where records are lacking. The appellant's evidence was sufficient in the absence of rebuttal or records from the respondent. The appeal is allowed and the appellant is awarded salaries for overtime, transport allowance, and costs.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant awarded salaries at 1.5 day's pay for 3 Saturdays worked
- Appellant awarded salaries at 2 days' pay for 7 Sundays and public holidays worked
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment