Cedras v Attorney General (CS 31/2020) [2021] SCSC 1076 (9 December 2021)
The Plaintiff was not entitled to the SCR 4,800 allowance as it was intended only for the sitting President’s Security Unit, not for ex-President’s security personnel. However, the Plaintiff was entitled to VVIP security allowances as specified in the 2007, 2011, and 2017 Schemes of Service for the relevant periods,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] SCSC 1076
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jossy Cedras; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2021
- Case Number
- CS 31/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff in part
- Legal Topics
- Public Service Allowances, Employment Benefits, Breach of Contract
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jossy Cedras
Plaintiff
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff was entitled to the SCR 4,800 allowance as claimed under the relevant Schemes of Service
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff was entitled to VVIP/VIP security allowances for the periods in question
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff was not entitled to the SCR 4,800 allowance as it was intended only for the sitting President’s Security Unit, not for ex-President’s security personnel. However, the Plaintiff was entitled to VVIP security allowances as specified in the 2007, 2011, and 2017 Schemes of Service for the relevant periods, with deductions for amounts already paid.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff in part
Orders
- Payment of SCR 21,000 for VVIP allowance at SCR 500 from July 2007 to January 2011
- Payment of SCR 14,400 for VVIP allowance at SCR 600 from January 2011 to November 2017, less amounts already paid from January 2013 to November 2017
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment