Ally v Julie (CS 46/2015) [2020] SCSC 547 (10 July 2020)

Ally v Julie (CS 46/2015) [2020] SCSC 547 (10 July 2020)

The encroachment was minimal, unintentional, and removal would cause disproportionate hardship. The de minimis rule applies, and token compensation is appropriate. The plaintiff failed to prove significant inconvenience or moral damages.

Citation
[2020] SCSC 547
Parties
Plaintiff: Leslie Ally; Defendant: Daphne Julie
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
10 July 2020
Case Number
CS 46/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaint granted with conditions; token damages awarded; each party to bear own costs.
Legal Topics
Encroachment, De Minimis Non Curat Lex, Damages, Abuse of Right
Source Language
English
Property Law Civil Procedure Encroachment De Minimis Non Curat Lex Damages Abuse of Right

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leslie Ally

Plaintiff

Daphne Julie

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's encroachment on the plaintiff's property warrants demolition or damages under the de minimis rule
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for loss, inconvenience, and moral damages

Ratio Decidendi

The encroachment was minimal, unintentional, and removal would cause disproportionate hardship. The de minimis rule applies, and token compensation is appropriate. The plaintiff failed to prove significant inconvenience or moral damages.

Court Disposition

Plaint granted with conditions; token damages awarded; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff SCR30,000 as compensation.
  • Both parties to bear their own costs.