Leste v Leste (DC 157/2014) [2015] SCSC 17 (21 January 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] SCSC 17
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Case number
- DC 157/2014
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Case number
- DC 157/2014
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The uncontroverted evidence established that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and the statutory requirements for divorce were satisfied, justifying dissolution of the marriage.
Court disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Conditional order for dissolution of marriage granted, to be made absolute within six weeks
- File closed
02
Material facts
Parties
Sylvette Sheilla Leste
Petitioner Counsel: Mr. CamilleRobin Leste
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down
- 02
Whether the statutory requirements for divorce are met
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The marriage has irretrievably broken down as the parties have lived apart for more than two years and the respondent has consented to the divorce.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not appear but provided written consent to the divorce.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Seychelles Matrimonial Causes Act
A marriage may be dissolved if it has irretrievably broken down and the parties have lived apart for the statutory period with consent.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The uncontroverted evidence established that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and the statutory requirements for divorce were satisfied, justifying dissolution of the marriage.
Court disposition
petition granted
- Conditional order for dissolution of marriage granted, to be made absolute within six weeks
- File closed
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court
Judgment
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SEYCHELLES Civil Side: DC 157/2014 [2015] SCSC 17
SYLVETTE SHEILLA LESTE Petitioner versus
ROBIN LESTE Respondent Heard: Counsel: 21 January 2015 Mr. Camille for petitioner Respondent – Not Available Delivered: 21 January 2015
JUDGMENT D. Karunakaran, Acting Chief Justice [1] This is a petition for divorce. The Petitioner Sylvette, Sheilla, Leste has applied to this Court for a dissolution of her marriage on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down because the parties have lived apart for a continuous period of more than one year immediately preceding the presentation of the petition and the Respondent has consented to the grant of divorce. The Respondent who was duly served with a copy of the petition defaulted appearance. Hence, the Court granted leave for the Petitioner to proceed with an ex-parte hearing in this matter. [2] In a nutshell the Petitioner testified that she was lawfully married to the Respondent in Seychelles on the 3rd of October 1996. At the time of marriage the Petitioner was a spinster, whereas the Respondent a bachelor. Both parties are Seychellois nationals, domiciled and resident in Seychelles. The Petitioner is unemployed, whereas the Respondent is working as a driver. The Petitioner categorically testified that her marriage with the Respondent has irretrievably broken down since they have lived apart for a continuous period of more than two years prior to the filing of the petition. Moreover, she produced a letter of consent duly signed by the Respondent signifying his consent to the grant of divorce. She also testified that there has been no previous
Court proceeding in respect of the said marriage in any Court either in Seychelles or elsewhere. Moreover, the Petitioner testified that the marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility for reconciliation between the parties. In the circumstances she stated that it is just and necessary that the marriage ought to be dissolved. [3] On the strength of the uncontroverted evidence I find that it is just and necessary that the marriage should be dissolved. Accordingly, I hereby dissolve the marriage. [4] WHEREFORE, I hereby make a conditional order for the dissolution of the marriage which should be made absolute within six weeks from the date hereof. [5] Petition granted accordingly. File is closed. Signed, dated and delivered at Ile du Port on 21 January 2015 D Karunakaran Ag Chief Justice 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.