MD v BL (CA 26/2016) [2017] SCSC 196 (28 February 2017)
The Hague Convention is not enforceable in Seychelles absent domestic legislation; the Family Tribunal erred in declining jurisdiction and failing to consider the best interests of the minors under the Children Act. The appeal succeeds and the Family Tribunal must hear the custody application on its merits.
- Citation
- [2017] SCSC 196
- Parties
- Appellant: M D; Respondent: B L
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2017
- Case Number
- CA 26/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Custody, Habitual Residence, International Child Abduction, Treaty Enforceability, Best Interests of the Child
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M D
Appellant
B L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Family Tribunal erred in declining jurisdiction on the basis of the Hague Convention and finding the minors habitual residents of France
- 2 Whether the Hague Convention is enforceable in Seychelles without domestic legislation
- 3 Whether the best interests of the child were properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The Hague Convention is not enforceable in Seychelles absent domestic legislation; the Family Tribunal erred in declining jurisdiction and failing to consider the best interests of the minors under the Children Act. The appeal succeeds and the Family Tribunal must hear the custody application on its merits.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Family Tribunal to hear the custody application on its merits under the Children Act
- Status quo of minors' custody as per the Stay Order of 27 December 2016 remains
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment