Fardial v R (CN 36/2016; CN 37/2016) [2017] SCSC 616 (12 July 2017)
The sentence of 7 years for theft of items valued at SR 1500 was harsh and excessive; it is reduced to 3 years. Sentences for counts in MC 317/2010 to run concurrently as offences occurred in the same transaction. The total sentence to be 6 ½ years, which is proportionate to the offences committed.
- Citation
- [2017] SCSC 616
- Parties
- Appellant: Marcus Fardial; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2017
- Case Number
- CN 36/2016 ; CN 37/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentences varied
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Totality Principle, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Appeal Against Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marcus Fardial
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were harsh, excessive, and wrong in principle
- 2 Whether sentences should run concurrently or consecutively
- 3 Whether the principle of totality of sentences was applied
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 7 years for theft of items valued at SR 1500 was harsh and excessive; it is reduced to 3 years. Sentences for counts in MC 317/2010 to run concurrently as offences occurred in the same transaction. The total sentence to be 6 ½ years, which is proportionate to the offences committed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentences varied
Orders
- Sentence of 7 years in MC 135/2010 quashed and substituted with 3 years imprisonment
- Sentences in MC 317/2010 (3 ½ years and 1 ½ years) to run concurrently
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment