Morel & Ors v Rose (CN 69/2016) [2020] SCSC 489 (2 April 2020)
The defendant, while driving his vehicle, negligently accelerated and struck Ericson Jules, a police officer conducting a spot check, causing his death. The defendant failed to rebut the presumption of fault under Article 1383(2) of the Civil Code. The acquittal in the criminal case did not bar civil liability....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 489
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Marie Alice Morel; Plaintiff: Donald Eric Jules; Plaintiff: Rouvani Jules; Plaintiff: Shanita Jules; Plaintiff: Elmonda Jules; Defendant: Dirk Rose
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 2 April 2020
- Case Number
- CN 69/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Delictual Action (civil Claim for Damages Arising From Road Accident) / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Liability for Motor Vehicle Accidents, Damages for Wrongful Death
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marie Alice Morel
Plaintiff
Donald Eric Jules
Plaintiff
Rouvani Jules
Plaintiff
Shanita Jules
Plaintiff
Elmonda Jules
Plaintiff
Dirk Rose
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Delictual Action (civil Claim for Damages Arising From Road Accident) / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable in negligence (faute) for the death of Ericson Jules
- 2 Whether the acquittal in the criminal case precluded civil liability
- 3 Quantum of damages payable to the plaintiffs
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant, while driving his vehicle, negligently accelerated and struck Ericson Jules, a police officer conducting a spot check, causing his death. The defendant failed to rebut the presumption of fault under Article 1383(2) of the Civil Code. The acquittal in the criminal case did not bar civil liability. Plaintiffs proved emotional and financial loss. Defendant is liable for damages.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay SR300,000 each to the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs
- Defendant to pay SR150,000 each to the 3rd, 4th, and 5th plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment