Petrovar-Didon vParkash (MA 103/202) [2021] SCSC 919 (16 June 2021)
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application to extend the time for appeal against its final judgment; such applications must be made to the Seychelles Court of Appeal.
- Citation
- [2021] SCSC 919
- Parties
- Applicant: Marthe Petrovar-Didon; Respondent: Chanderparkash
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2021
- Case Number
- MA 103/202
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Jurisdiction, Functus Officio, Leave to Appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Marthe Petrovar-Didon
Applicant
Chanderparkash
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal out of time against its final judgment
- 2 Whether the application was brought before the proper forum
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application to extend the time for appeal against its final judgment; such applications must be made to the Seychelles Court of Appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Costs awarded to the Respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment