Petrovar-Didon vParkash (MA 103/202) [2021] SCSC 919 (16 June 2021)

Petrovar-Didon vParkash (MA 103/202) [2021] SCSC 919 (16 June 2021)

The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application to extend the time for appeal against its final judgment; such applications must be made to the Seychelles Court of Appeal.

Citation
[2021] SCSC 919
Parties
Applicant: Marthe Petrovar-Didon; Respondent: Chanderparkash
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
16 June 2021
Case Number
MA 103/202
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Jurisdiction, Functus Officio, Leave to Appeal
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marthe Petrovar-Didon

Applicant

Chanderparkash

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal out of time against its final judgment
  2. 2 Whether the application was brought before the proper forum

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application to extend the time for appeal against its final judgment; such applications must be made to the Seychelles Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
  • Costs awarded to the Respondent