Brice vs Planning Authority (CS 140.2012) [2014] SCSC 117 (14 February 2014)

Brice vs Planning Authority (CS 140.2012) [2014] SCSC 117 (14 February 2014)

The Planning Authority and Minister considered relevant facts and expert opinion, and there was no evidence of double standards or unreasonableness. The decisions were neither irrational nor unreasonable.

Citation
[2014] SCSC 117
Parties
Plaintiff: Michel Brice; Defendant: The Planning Authority
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
14 February 2014
Case Number
CS 140.2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Land Subdivision, Reasonableness of Administrative Decisions
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Judicial Review Certiorari Mandamus Land Subdivision Reasonableness of Administrative Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michel Brice

Plaintiff

The Planning Authority

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the decision of the Planning Authority and the Minister was irrational and unreasonable in refusing the subdivision application on density grounds
  2. 2 Whether the decision-making process involved double standards or unfairness

Ratio Decidendi

The Planning Authority and Minister considered relevant facts and expert opinion, and there was no evidence of double standards or unreasonableness. The decisions were neither irrational nor unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed