Laporte vs Phare (CS 277.2002) [2013] SCSC 73 (4 November 2013)
The defendant's retaining wall encroached on the plaintiff's property, and the defendant must remove the encroachment within six months or become liable for damages and removal costs. The claim for damages is dismissed due to mitigating circumstances.
- Citation
- [2013] SCSC 73
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mina Laporte; Defendant: Felix Phare
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2013
- Case Number
- CS 277.2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for removal of encroachment allowed; claim for damages dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Encroachment, Trespass, Damages, Land Ownership
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mina Laporte
Plaintiff
Felix Phare
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's retaining wall encroached on the plaintiff's land
- 2 Whether the defendant is liable for damages to the plaintiff's property
- 3 Whether the defendant should be ordered to remove the encroaching structure
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's retaining wall encroached on the plaintiff's property, and the defendant must remove the encroachment within six months or become liable for damages and removal costs. The claim for damages is dismissed due to mitigating circumstances.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for removal of encroachment allowed; claim for damages dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant to demolish the retaining wall encroaching on plaintiff's property within 6 months.
- If not demolished within 6 months, defendant liable for Rs20,000.00 damages plus plaintiff's demolition costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment