Mr. M vs Government of Seychelles and another (CS 383/2008) [2013] SCSC 70 (17 October 2013)
The plaintiff failed to prove any negligence or causal link between the catheterization and his impotency; the evidence showed the complications arose from his chronic diabetes and hypertension, not from any fault of the defendants' employees.
- Citation
- [2013] SCSC 70
- Parties
- Plaintiff: MR. M; First Defendant: THE GOVERNMENT OF SEYCHELLES; Second Defendant: THE HEALTH SERVICE AUTHORITY
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2013
- Case Number
- CS 383/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Medical Negligence, Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MR. M
Plaintiff
THE GOVERNMENT OF SEYCHELLES
First Defendant
THE HEALTH SERVICE AUTHORITY
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was medical negligence by the doctors during catheterization on 16th July 2006
- 2 Whether the catheterization caused the plaintiff's impotency
- 3 Whether the plaintiff proved his case to the required civil standard
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to prove any negligence or causal link between the catheterization and his impotency; the evidence showed the complications arose from his chronic diabetes and hypertension, not from any fault of the defendants' employees.
Court Disposition
Plaint dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment