Pierre (born Timonina) v Attorney-General & Ors (CS 241/2008) [2008] SCSC 34 (11 September 2008)
The application for interim injunction is dismissed because the relief sought is not interim but perpetual in nature and does not relate to the main action for damages. The plaintiffs have not shown a serious question to be tried, and any loss suffered can be adequately compensated by damages. The Immigration Officer acted within statutory discretion, and the proper remedy for challenging the administrative decision would be judicial review, not a civil suit for fault.
- Citation
- [2008] SCSC 34
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mrs. Yulia Pierre (born Timonina); Plaintiff: Mr. Gaetan Patrick Pierre; Defendant: The Attorney General; Defendant: Immigration Officer; Defendant: Air Seychelles
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2008
- Case Number
- CS 241/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Mandatory Injunction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Prohibited Immigrant Status, Sovereign Discretion, Damages for Fault, Judicial Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs. Yulia Pierre (born Timonina)
Plaintiff
Mr. Gaetan Patrick Pierre
Plaintiff
The Attorney General
Defendant
Immigration Officer
Defendant
Air Seychelles
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Interim Mandatory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an interim mandatory injunction ordering the Immigration Officer to revoke and cancel the impugned letter declaring Ms. Timonina a prohibited immigrant and ordering Air Seychelles to allow her to board a flight to Seychelles
- 2 Whether the issuance of the impugned letter was illegal, malicious, or amounted to a 'faute' in law
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs would be adequately compensated by damages if the injunction is not granted
Ratio Decidendi
The application for interim injunction is dismissed because the relief sought is not interim but perpetual in nature and does not relate to the main action for damages. The plaintiffs have not shown a serious question to be tried, and any loss suffered can be adequately compensated by damages. The Immigration Officer acted within statutory discretion, and the proper remedy for challenging the administrative decision would be judicial review, not a civil suit for fault.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Interim injunction sought by the plaintiffs is declined.
- Application dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment