Nourrice v R (CN 14C/2004) [2007] SCSC 125 (1 February 2007)

Nourrice v R (CN 14C/2004) [2007] SCSC 125 (1 February 2007)

The conviction was unsafe because the prosecution failed to prove a fundamental element of the offence—custody, charge or care of the child—beyond reasonable doubt, and there was a lack of corroboration regarding the alleged assault, resulting in reasonable doubt in favour of the accused.

Citation
[2007] SCSC 125
Parties
Appellant: Nourrice; Respondent: Republic
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
1 February 2007
Case Number
CN 14C/2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Assault of a Child, Corroboration of Evidence, Standard of Proof, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nourrice

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had custody, charge or care of the child at the material time
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused wilfully assaulted or mistreated the child
  3. 3 Whether inconsistencies and lack of corroboration in witness testimony rendered the conviction unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was unsafe because the prosecution failed to prove a fundamental element of the offence—custody, charge or care of the child—beyond reasonable doubt, and there was a lack of corroboration regarding the alleged assault, resulting in reasonable doubt in favour of the accused.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • charge against the accused dismissed
  • sentence set aside