Onezime v National Drugs Enforcement Agency & Ors (CP 5 of 2013) [2018] SCCC 2 (22 January 2018)

Onezime v National Drugs Enforcement Agency & Ors (CP 5 of 2013) [2018] SCCC 2 (22 January 2018)

The parties agreed by consent to forfeit the sum of €20,000 to the 2nd Respondent and to waive all claims to the money, with each party bearing their own costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] SCCC 2
Parties
Petitioner: Mervin Onezime; Respondent: National Drugs Enforcement Agency & Ors
Court
Constitutional Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Case Number
CP 5 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment by Consent
Outcome
settled by consent
Legal Topics
Forfeiture of Property, Settlement, Drug Enforcement
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Forfeiture of Property Settlement Drug Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mervin Onezime

Petitioner

National Drugs Enforcement Agency & Ors

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment by Consent

  1. 1 forfeiture of money exhibited in criminal proceedings
  2. 2 final settlement of claims to the money

Ratio Decidendi

The parties agreed by consent to forfeit the sum of €20,000 to the 2nd Respondent and to waive all claims to the money, with each party bearing their own costs.

Court Disposition

settled by consent

Orders

  • The sum of €20,000 exhibited as Exhibit P5 in Criminal case number 61 of 2013 is forfeited to the 2nd Respondent.
  • The Petitioner shall not have any claim, rights or interests in the money.