Parcou v Laporte (MC 109/2019) [2020] SCSC 508 (21 May 2020)
The court found no reasonable grounds to refer the alleged constitutional issue to the Constitutional Court, as the manner in which it was raised was insufficient and unsustainable. The petition for new trial is to proceed in the ordinary course.
- Citation
- [2020] SCSC 508
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rosita Parcou; Respondent: Jill Laporte
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2020
- Case Number
- MC 109/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for New Trial / Ruling on Referral to Constitutional Court and Directions for Further Proceedings
- Outcome
- No referral to Constitutional Court; petition for new trial to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- New Trial, Constitutional Referral, Protection of Family, Burden of Proof, Paternity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosita Parcou
Petitioner
Jill Laporte
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for New Trial / Ruling on Referral to Constitutional Court and Directions for Further Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition raises a constitutional question requiring referral to the Constitutional Court under Article 46(7) of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the petition for new trial should proceed and in what manner
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no reasonable grounds to refer the alleged constitutional issue to the Constitutional Court, as the manner in which it was raised was insufficient and unsustainable. The petition for new trial is to proceed in the ordinary course.
Court Disposition
No referral to Constitutional Court; petition for new trial to proceed.
Orders
- Petition for new trial to be fixed for mention for parties to indicate mode of submissions.
- No referral to Constitutional Court under Article 46(7) of the Constitution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment