Lesperance v Bastienne (MA 210/2017 (arising in CS 246/2006)) [2017] SCSC 956 (6 November 2017)
A proper basis for a stay has been established as it would be fair to all parties, given the points of law raised and that a short delay in payment will not cause undue hardship to the respondent.
- Citation
- [2017] SCSC 956
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Lesperance; Respondent: Benny Bastienne
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 6 November 2017
- Case Number
- MA 210/2017 (arising in CS 246/2006)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Motion / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted pending appeal
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal, Discretionary Powers of Court
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Peter Lesperance
Applicant
Benny Bastienne
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Motion / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal
- 2 Whether the applicant has established a proper basis for a stay
Ratio Decidendi
A proper basis for a stay has been established as it would be fair to all parties, given the points of law raised and that a short delay in payment will not cause undue hardship to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted pending appeal
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 5th June 2017 against the applicant pending appeal
- No further action to be taken by any parties in relation to the disputed land parcels
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment