Property Management Corporation v Florentine (679) [2023] SCSC 679 (12 September 2023)
The Defendant breached the purchase agreement by failing to pay the required monthly instalments, and did not specifically deny the Plaintiff's material allegations. The Plaintiff is therefore entitled to repossess the property and recover charges for beneficial occupancy.
- Citation
- [2023] SCSC 679
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2023
- Case Number
- 679
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Eviction, Repossession, Beneficial Occupancy Charges
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant breached the purchase agreement by failing to pay monthly instalments
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to repossess the property and claim charges for beneficial occupancy
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant breached the purchase agreement by failing to pay the required monthly instalments, and did not specifically deny the Plaintiff's material allegations. The Plaintiff is therefore entitled to repossess the property and recover charges for beneficial occupancy.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- The Defendant shall pay the sum of SCR 80,274 as charge for beneficial occupancy of the premises with interest at the legal rate from the date of filing.
- The Defendant shall vacate the house and property at S14-14 at Perseverance, Mahe, with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment