R vs Barreau (CO 26.2011) [2014] SCSC 104 (19 March 2014)
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in possession and had knowledge of the controlled drugs (heroin and cannabis) found in his house, and the chain of custody was established. The evidence of the prosecution was corroborated and credible, while the defence was rejected as inconsistent and unconvincing.
- Citation
- [2014] SCSC 104
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Francis Barreau
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2014
- Case Number
- CO 26.2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Controlled Drugs, Chain of Custody, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecutor
Francis Barreau
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was in possession of a controlled drug (heroin and cannabis) contrary to the Misuse of Drugs Act
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved the elements of possession and knowledge beyond reasonable doubt
- 3 Whether the chain of custody of the exhibits was established
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was in possession and had knowledge of the controlled drugs (heroin and cannabis) found in his house, and the chain of custody was established. The evidence of the prosecution was corroborated and credible, while the defence was rejected as inconsistent and unconvincing.
Court Disposition
conviction
Orders
- The accused is found guilty and convicted of possession of 1.25 grams of heroin.
- The accused is found guilty and convicted of possession of 0.09 grams of cannabis herbal materials.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment