Pragassen v Vidot (CS 360/2005) [2010] SCSC 124 (2 July 2010)

Pragassen v Vidot (CS 360/2005) [2010] SCSC 124 (2 July 2010)

The plaintiff failed to prove the value of the gifted property or that the lease exceeded the disposable portion; no evidence of disguised donation or fraudulent intent was adduced. The lease was a valid gift inter vivos and not contrary to public order or the Civil Code.

Citation
[2010] SCSC 124
Parties
Plaintiff: Pragassen; Defendant: Vidot
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Seychelles
Judgment Date
2 July 2010
Case Number
CS 360/2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Merits After Plea in Limine Litis
Outcome
Plaint dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Disguised Donation, Gift Inter Vivos, Lease Agreement, Disposable Portion, Succession Rights, Res Judicata
Source Language
English
Succession Law Property Law Disguised Donation Gift Inter Vivos Lease Agreement Disposable Portion Succession Rights Res Judicata

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pragassen

Plaintiff

Vidot

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Merits After Plea in Limine Litis

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lease agreement constituted a disguised donation exceeding the disposable portion under the Civil Code of Seychelles
  2. 2 Whether the matter was res judicata

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove the value of the gifted property or that the lease exceeded the disposable portion; no evidence of disguised donation or fraudulent intent was adduced. The lease was a valid gift inter vivos and not contrary to public order or the Civil Code.

Court Disposition

Plaint dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Plaint dismissed with costs