R v Agathine & Ors (CO 02/2021) [2021] SCSC 843 (28 January 2021)
The combined seriousness of the offences, the accuseds' status as police officers, and the risk of interference with witnesses and the investigation constitute substantial grounds to deny bail and remand the accused in custody.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] SCSC 843
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; 1st Accused: Archille Christian Agathine; 2nd Accused: Julius Sebastian Zialor; 3rd Accused: Jean-Paul Marius Marie
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Seychelles
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2021
- Case Number
- CO 02/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail application declined; accused to remain in remand custody.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Remand, Police Misconduct, Theft, Sexual Assault
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Archille Christian Agathine
1st Accused
Julius Sebastian Zialor
2nd Accused
Jean-Paul Marius Marie
3rd Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be remanded in custody pending trial
- 2 Whether seriousness of the offence alone justifies pre-trial detention
- 3 Whether there are substantial grounds to believe the accused would interfere with witnesses or the course of justice
Ratio Decidendi
The combined seriousness of the offences, the accuseds' status as police officers, and the risk of interference with witnesses and the investigation constitute substantial grounds to deny bail and remand the accused in custody.
Court Disposition
Bail application declined; accused to remain in remand custody.
Orders
- All three accused to be remanded in custody pending trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment